Want to try our resources? Sign up for our 14-Day Free Trial

Demo & Training
Business & Organisations
Terms & Conditions

Should artefacts be returned to where they were taken from?

15th - 22nd September 2023

Back to results

56785

Total votes

16599

5-11 votes

40186

11-16+ votes

When perusing your local museum (be that the one run by your local authority or the Natural History Museum) there is always a treasure trove of artefacts that tell a story. Frequently that is the story that the curator wants to tell, but sometimes, and if you look closely, there is another story.

One that dips back into the uncomfortable history of Empire and the looting of cultural artefacts by British soldiers, explorers and 19th century ‘Great Powers’ diplomacy. This legacy is one that crops up not only with the Parthenon Marbles at the British Museum or the Benin Bronzes, but also in the many anthropological artefacts that fill museums across the country.

For this VoteTopic, voters mused about where historical and cultural objects belong, in light of the ongoing debate around the repatriation of artefacts to different nations and peoples from museums in the UK and worldwide.

child

7-11 voter

"Artefacts should be returned to countries they were taken from because it's that country's history."

teenager

11-16 voter

"We need to have more information in order to fully understand the transaction/event that took place in order to acquire these artefacts before making a fair decision. There are many factors in place."

student

16 + voter

"Why call it the British Museum at all? Most of the stuff there isn't British! Why should history be in one place? Makes no sense. It's taking away the glory of every other country."

71% of our 16+ voters said that nations should be able to ask for their cultural objects to be returned.

  • Our voters aged 16+ were discussing whether nations should be able to ask for their cultural objects to be returned to them.
  • Almost three-quarters voted 'Yes'.
  • Some students explained that it depends on the significance of the object; if it is significant or special to the nation it came from, it should be returned.
57% of 11-16 voters said 'Yes' to: "Should artefacts be returned to where they were taken from?"

  • Almost 3 out of 5 Secondary students argued that artefacts should be returned to where they were taken from.
  • The comments were mixed, with some students arguing that artefacts belong to the country they came from and others highlighting that moving the artefacts could damage them.
71% of those aged 7-11 agreed, believing that objects should be kept in the places that they were originally found.

  • Primary pupils were more decisive, with over 70% arguing that the objects should be returned.
  • Many said that it was unfair for museums to keep them when they didn't belong to them.
86% of those aged 5-7 argued that we should always give back objects when people ask for them.

  • Our youngest voters, aged 5-7 were discussing whether we should always return objects when people ask for them.
  • A staggering 86% of pupils voted 'Yes'.
results

Feedback from our Partners...

Thank you so much to our Impact Partner, the Horniman Museum and Gardens for responding to what the children said about this topic.

The Horniman Museum and Gardens is based in South-East London and houses an award winning series of collections and exhibits. Until 2022, it was home to some of the Benin Bronzes. In November of that year, the artefacts were repatriated to their origin country, Nigeria, from where they were taken by British soliders in the late 19th century.

see previous week's results